2. The problem with looking for solutions is that it takes your eyes off Jesus

3. A look at language diversity by country

4. On the end of hunger

5. A great answer to John Pipers’ “Why Don’t Women Read & Pray in Bethlehem’s Church Services?”

—————–

After discovering this incredible TED Talk, we were amazed at how the truths expressed in it relate to the body of Christ. We believe that growing in our connection and vulnerability is vital for the church today. Below, we take a look at some of the ideas Brown discusses in her talk and how they find expression within a close community of believers.

Connection

From childhood, we are bombarded with the message that we need to be unique, independent, and to “have a mind of our own.” This thinking has found its way into the church today. We have lost sight of our corporate nature, as the body of Christ, and instead have chosen to focus on our individuality. We use phrases like “my personal relationship with Christ” or “my personal journey,” both of which instill in us the thought that we are to do this on our own, but it was never meant to be this way.

We know that we are a part of the body of Christ and yet we are taught that we should be able to “live out our faith” on our own. This understanding, though, goes against the truth of being members of Christ’s body. Think about your physical body. You would never expect that your hand could live life separated from the rest of your body. It must to be connected in order for it to function and live. In fact, its identity and purpose is bound up in its relationship to the body and if detached from the body it instantly becomes lifeless. In the same way, you and I cannot detach ourselves from the body any more than a branch can detach itself from the vine. We are each members of Christ and his body (1 Cor 12:12). This is the reality of who we are, whether we choose to believe it or not.

The truth is that “God himself is community. His purpose is all about community. The Bible from cover to cover is all about community. It is all about God’s eternal plan to have a community of humans who contain his life and express his nature” (Milt Rodriguez, The Butterfly in You). We see this in the many ways that the body of Christ is referred to throughout scripture: body, family, marriage, vine and branches.

The Christian life was never meant to be lived individually. It was always meant to be lived corporately. In fact, we cannot entirely discover our true identity and purpose unless we are part of a group of believers. Why? Because we cannot know our identity apart from Christ and Christ is corporate, both head and body (Eph. 1:22-23).

Shame, Vulnerability, and Worthiness

If we are built for community and the Christian life is supposed to be corporate, then why don’t we live in a way that reflects that? The reason is surprisingly simple. We don’t believe we are worthy. We don’t know the truth of who Christ is, and who we are in Him. And without knowing our true identity we live in the fear that we are not thin enough, rich enough, beautiful enough, smart enough, and so on. We believe the lie of the evil one, that we should feel shame about who we are and what we have done, that there may be something about us that if seen by others, would deem us unworthy of connection. These feelings, these fears, are extremely powerful. We want to be known, loved, and accepted, but we don’t believe we will be if we are fully seen. We live in fear of vulnerability and believe that the shame it may bring us will break us, when in fact, it is when we do not embrace vulnerability that we are hindered from living fully.

When Brown discusses wholehearted people she says that they are people who have learned to let go of who they think they should be, in order to be who they are. As believers, we are often taught countless ideas of what a “good Christian life” should look like, with lists of dos and don’ts. We spend our energy trying to measure up and feel shame when we fall short. This, again, is not the way we were intended to live. We have to let go of who we think we should be and rest in the reality of who we are.

So, who are we? Your identity, if you are in Christ, is now based on the new man (Christ) and not the old man (Adam). Your nature has been changed. You are a saint, not a sinner. In his book, The Butterfly in You, Milt Rodriguez beautifully states who we are:

“We are already saints. We are already holy. We are already blameless. We are already pure and spotless and without blemish. We are already pleasing to God. We are already in Canaan land. We are in Christ. This is the deception of all deceptions. To try and become something we already are. To attempt to get some place we already are. We have already been crucified with him. We have already been resurrected with him. We have already been ascended with him. We we are right now seated with him in the heavenlies (Eph. 2:5,6).”

Regardless of whether you choose to believe this or not, this is who you are. If you know that this is who you are, it changes how you view yourself, relate to God, and relate to others. When we see who Christ is, and by extension who we are (for we have his DNA) then we understand that we are enough (for we have him, all of him, inside of us), that we are worthy (because he has made us so), and that there is no fear in being vulnerable (because we know that we are worthy).

Wholehearted

Brown states that wholehearted people are those with a deep sense of worthiness. What deeper sense of worthiness could we have than one that finds its identity fully and solely in Christ? She talks about living courageously, telling the story of who we are with our whole heart. When we are resting in who we are in Christ, when we have died to ourselves and become one of many members of the body of Christ, it is his story we are telling with our whole hearts. All of those pieces of ourselves that we fear may bring shame to us, we can now recognize that Christ has brought into who he is, and thus made entirely beautiful. Knowing this should give us compassion for ourselves and our shortcomings, but also compassion for others whose shortcomings we will see as we connect in community.

To live in close community is to risk much. Before true community life can exist, there must first be death that happens in each individual life. Why? Because, otherwise our lives, dreams, and personal interests get in the way of Christ and what he wants to do. He must have preeminence in all things in our lives. We see this in John 12:25, “He who loves his soul-life loses it; and he who hates his soul-life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal.” We lay down our lives, we choose to be deeply and vulnerably seen, and we choose to have courage, all so that Christ can have his own house, family, image, body, and bride.

Seeing through the spirit vs. the flesh

Brown describes the job of parenthood as one of recognizing a child’s imperfections but teaching them that, despite those, they are worthy of love and belonging. We all have imperfections, those things that may annoy or frustrate others. These imperfections can become magnified when we are living in close community with other believers. The question is how we are going to choose to react in these situations. There are two choices. We can either choose to view people through the flesh or through the spirit.

To know people through the flesh is to choose to live by the old man and not the new. It is to live by our lives and not His life. It is to focus on something other than Jesus. When we do this, we see believers for who they were and not for who they are now. However, to know people through the spirit is to live by His life and to focus on Him who is All in All. It is to choose to see them as Christ sees them. When we do this, we are able to see their true identity.

Conclusion

As members of Christ’s body, we must live in connection with the other members. Knowing who we are in Christ, we are free to make ourselves vulnerable, no matter the risk involved, as we acknowledge and rest in the worthiness we have received in Christ. At the same time, we should recognize the same worthiness in others who are in Christ and view them as he views them, giving them freedom to vulnerably connect in a community/body of believers. As Paul reminded us in Ephesians 4:16, “From him the whole body, joined and held together by every supporting ligament, grows and builds itself up in love, as each part does its work.”

When we, out of fear and a feeling of unworthiness, keep to ourselves the life that Christ has given to us, we hinder the growth and building of the body. Christ has placed his life in every member of his body and his life is most fully expressed in the world when each member functions, in connection and community, building each other up in love, growing together, and expressing Him corporately.

H/T Opalo

So, although Kristof’s article proposed Maggie Doyne as the cover girl for D.I.Y. aid and the triumph of passionate amateurs over stuffy institutionalized professionalism, Doyne’s approach can in fact be seen as the opposite of D.I.Y. Rather than the triumph of the individual, Kopila Valley Children’s Home and School are an example of the power of local communities, with support, to come together to build solutions to their own greatest challenges.

Moreover, Doyne herself is an example of how much more than passion is needed in order to make a positive difference in the world…

Just as passionate persistence without professional skills won’t get you a part in The Hobbit, good intentions without professional skill won’t result in doing the good you intend.

But, as Algoso noted, we all start as amateurs. So the question is not whether or not you already have all the skills you need to get that part on The Hobbit, or make a positive contribution to a social problem that moves you. The question is whether you are willing to take your passion, and your persistence, and direct them towards acquiring the skills, knowledge and collaborators you need.

This is from an article at the Huffington Post by Marianne Elliott.

The sentence “good intentions without professional skill won’t result in doing the good you intend” is a powerful one. We tend to believe that as long as we have passion and a desire to help and do good, that will be enough to actually make a difference. The problem is that if you do not know how to effectively help, then you run the risk of doing more harm than good. Too many non-profits these days are staffed by people that want to help, but have never taken the time, as Maggie Doyne as done, to commit themselves to the study of the best practice of development.

The central argument of the paper is that Dodd-Frank 1502, while based in well-intentioned efforts to improve the situation in the Congo, has caused more problems that it has solved, and is unlikely to improve the security situation in eastern Congo when the SEC rules are released and implemented. This is because there is no evidence that supply chain traceability mechanisms actually get fighters to stop fighting, particularly in a very weak state. Moreover, as we are already seeing, smuggling tends to increase and civilian miners are put out of work. In the paper, I delve into an analysis of why the advocacy community chose to focus on conflict minerals and why that focus was misguided. I also suggest steps for a way forward that would both help to improve transparency in the mineral trade while arguing that violence is a separate problem with a separate solution.

I have been following the debate surrounding Dodd-Frank 1502 for quite some time. This paper sums up well the issues with this bill, its unintended consequences, and what should be done about it.

For anyone interested in the Congo, this paper is a must read.

The illusion of asymmetric insight makes it seem as though you know everyone else far better than they know you, and not only that, but you know them better than they know themselves. You believe the same thing about groups of which you are a member. As a whole, your group understands outsiders better than outsiders understand your group, and you understand the group better than its members know the group to which they belong.

The researchers explained this is how one eventually arrives at the illusion of naive realism, or believing your thoughts and perceptions are true, accurate and correct, therefore if someone sees things differently than you or disagrees with you in some way it is the result of a bias or an influence or a shortcoming. You feel like the other person must have been tainted in some way, otherwise they would see the world the way you do – the right way. The illusion of asymmetrical insight clouds your ability to see the people you disagree with as nuanced and complex. You tend to see your self and the groups you belong to in shades of gray, but others and their groups as solid and defined primary colors lacking nuance or complexity.

It is in out nature to form groups. As such we need to be aware of the dynamics and identities brought out by groups and how they affect how we view those inside the groups we belong to and those outside our groups. There will always be an Us and Them. That is just how groups work. Being aware of asymmetric insight helps us to better understand both ourselves and others. It also helps if we can step back and empathize with those different from us, allowing us to understand and see how they perceive both us and the world around them.

The people did beseech the warrior to aid them. They were a simple people, capable only of rewarding him with gratitude and a larger-than-normal serving of Jell-O salad. The warrior considered the possible battles before him. While others may have shirked the duties, forcing the good people of Ferndale Street to prostrate themselves before the tyrants of Comcast, Linksys, and Geek Squad, the warrior could not chill his heart to these depths. He accepted the quest and strode bravely across the beige shag carpet of the living room.

You should definitely read the rest. The entire thing is great. And true. That is just how it happens. I speak from experience.

Just watch it. I don’t think anything else needs to be said.

“At Oliberté, we believe Africa can compete on a global scale,” he says, “but it needs a chance. It doesn’t need handouts or a hand up. It needs people to start shaking hands and companies to start making deals to work in these countries.”

Oliberté shoes are stitched and assembled in Ethiopia with leather sourced from local free-range cows, sheep, and goats—the default in a country with many herders whose livelihoods depend upon ranging wherever grass may be. The livestock haven’t been injected with hormones to speed their growth, a common practice in other parts of the world. The result is a light, limber, yet sturdy upper.

The shoes feature crepe rubber soles made from natural rubber processed in Liberia and lined with soft, breathable goat leather. This spring, the company will expand its line to offer leather bags and accessories, some of which will be sourced in Kenya and made in Zambia. It produces woven labels and other branding materials in the African island nation Mauritius.

I love what this company is doing. Sourcing materials and producing the shoes in a number of countries across Africa. Creating jobs and producing a quality product. What more could you ask for?

I have written about TOMS shoes and why I do not support the way they give shoes away. They create dependency, not jobs.

“The largest gap remains the lack of any kind of systemic approach either to sharing information or to listening, gathering feedback or collecting and responding to complaints,” the report said.

…Many aid agencies did not make speaking with Haitians in the local language of Creole a priority, the report found.

…”Humanitarian agencies overwhelmed by the scale of the disaster – and for many the impact on their own staff and offices – mostly did not prioritise communication with affected communities,” the report said. “Surprisingly few of those with a long-term presence had local Creole-speaking spokespeople.”

…While several local radio stations were up and running within hours following the earthquake, providing a popular source of news to many Haitians, few aid agencies made attempts to work closely with them and/or other local journalists immediately after the disaster.

I think this underscores a couple of problems in the aid community.

First, organizations are so focused on helping and doing good that they have lost sight of who they are trying to help and what they need. How else could you explain NGOs either not sharing information with beneficiaries or not listening to beneficiaries and finding out what they prioritize, want, or need, especially not in their language.

Second, for all the talk NGOs do about working with beneficiaries, most of the time they tend to want to do everything themselves, under the false assumption that they can do it better or that locals have nothing to offer.

At the core of it all, I believe, is the belief that because they are poor, they need our help, and that leads us to look down on them as if we have all the answers and they need us to do things for them.